Propfirmito may earn a commission, at no additional cost to you, when you sign up through our links. Our scoring remains independent. Full disclosure ›
50%UP TO
BlueBerry Funded ★ Up to 50% off on all challenges · From $25 ($5K) · Verified September 2026CodeRAMESCO
TL;DR. Blueberry Funded is among the few broker-backed prop firm I’ve audited where the rules feel like they were written by traders, not lawyers. Static drawdown, no consistency rule, 80% profit split scaling to 90%, and — for accounts purchased on or after March 12, 2026 — martingale and grid are now permitted. The catches: news trading is restricted in a 4-minute window around high-impact prints, leverage is conservative (1:30 on FX everywhere except the 2-Step challenge phase, which is 1:50), HFT and tick scalping are hard-banned, third-party copy trading is banned, and U.S. and Australian residents can’t trade. If you’re outside those jurisdictions and you trade discretionary forex or indices, this is one of the cleanest setups on the market right now.
The up-to-50% discount (50% for first-time users) with code RAMESCO is live on the banner above this article — it auto-updates from the same source as our home page, so what you see is what’s actually running this week.
The setup — why I bothered with another prop firm review
I run Propfirmito. I’ve reviewed nineteen prop firms in detail and score 317 of their accounts on a 0–100 scale. The honest reason some of them blur together is that the rule sets are 95% identical, the marketing is 100% identical, and the difference between “good” and “trap” usually comes down to two or three clauses that no one mentions until you’ve already paid.
Blueberry Funded showed up on my radar in late 2024, when traders started asking why our matcher kept ranking it higher than the bigger names for certain profiles. I dismissed it twice. Then the firm’s third-party-verified payout counter rolled past $7M and I figured I owed it a proper audit.
That’s how I ended up reading every line of the public T&Cs, the help-center articles, the fee schedule, and the prohibited-strategies update. I cross-checked every claim on the marketing pages against the actual rules. I watched what changed after their March 12, 2026 ruleset transition. I wasn’t trying to win anything. I was trying to figure out where the marketing language and the legal documents diverge — because that’s where traders get hurt.
What follows is what I learned, in the order I learned it. If you only have ninety seconds, jump to the verdict at the bottom.
What Blueberry Funded actually is (and what it isn’t)
Most prop firms are tech companies with a payment processor and a dashboard. They don’t own a broker. They don’t have liquidity relationships. When you “trade” you’re trading on simulated capital with synthetic fills, and your “payout” is a marketing budget line item.
Blueberry Funded is different in one specific way: it sits inside Blueberry Markets, an Australian-licensed FX broker that’s been around since 2015. The prop firm itself launched in 2024 — that’s an important distinction the marketing sometimes blurs. The “9 years” you see referenced on their site is the parent broker. The prop firm hero number on the home page is 15,000+ funded traders (and the third-party-verified live counter shows 10,600 traders / $7,418,270 in all-time payouts / $381,068 in the last 30 days). That matters because:
The good part: the platform infrastructure, spreads, and execution tech are mature. You’re not trading on a MetaTrader bridge that someone wired up last quarter.
- The honest part: the prop firm itself is young. The track record of paying scaled traders over multiple years doesn’t exist yet.
For me, that combination — mature broker + young prop firm — is more interesting than the inverse, which is what most of the industry looks like. A young prop firm built on top of a young broker is the configuration that goes bust without warning.
The legal entity for the trader contract is BBF Capital, and the evaluation is structured as a “Technology Access and Trader Assessment Program” — that’s the language in the terms PDF. Standard prop-firm legal scaffolding. Nothing exotic.
What each program costs and what it asks of you
There are five paths to a funded account, plus a separate Synthetic Indices Challenge for traders who specifically trade Deriv/synthetic instruments (out of scope for this review — if that’s you, check their dedicated synthetics docs). Here’s the honest comparison for the five core programs, with my take on which one fits which trader:
| Program | Entry fee | Profit target | Max DD | Daily DD | Min days | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Step | $275 | 10% (single phase) | 6% | 4% | 3 days | Confident traders who want one clean test |
| 2-Step | $300 | P1: 10% / P2: 5% | 10% | 5% | 3 days/phase | The “default” choice — broadest sweet spot |
| Prime 2-Step | $325 | P1: 8% / P2: 6% | 10% | 4% | 5 days/phase | Discretionary traders who want no per-trade risk cap |
| Instant Elite | $400 | None | 10% | None | 5 days | Experienced traders who hate evals |
| Instant Lite | from $42.50 ($1.25K) to $785 ($100K) | None | 4% | 2% | None | Cheap proving ground / sandbox |
Prices shown are for the entry-level account size. With code RAMESCO you take up to 50% off (50% for first-time users) — that’s the live rate at the top of this article. For the largest account ($200K), the Prime 2-Step runs $1,462 before discount.
A few things that surprised me when I went through the spec:
Prime 2-Step has no max risk per trade. That’s the single most aggressive spec I’ve seen on a regulated-broker-backed program. Most firms cap you at 1–2% per trade once you’re funded. Prime keeps that off. If you’re a position trader who wants to sit on one well-sized conviction trade, this is the only program in the lineup that lets you do it without rule anxiety.
The 2-Step has 1:50 leverage on FX during the challenge phase while every other program is 1:30. The catch nobody mentions in marketing: once you pass the 2-Step and move to the Funded account, leverage drops to 1:30 to match the rest of the lineup. So the 1:50 is a phase-only perk, not a permanent edge. Within prop firms, 1:50 is still the “more aggressive” tier — and it pairs with a higher per-phase profit target (10% on P1 vs Prime’s 8%), so it’s a calibrated trade-off, not a giveaway.
Instant Lite from $42.50 is genuinely cheap. That’s almost the cost of a single MT5 indicator on the marketplace. With code RAMESCO, a first-time user pays about $21.25 for the $1.25K version. The catch is that the daily DD is only 2% — so two bad trades in one session and you’re done. I’d treat it as a cheap dashboard test, not as a serious income path.
Instant Elite is interesting and I keep going back and forth on it. No daily drawdown. No profit target. Trailing-lock max DD instead of static. For a discretionary swing trader who hates being benched by a 4% daily limit, it’s the only program in this lineup that removes that ceiling. But $400 for the smallest size means you need real conviction.
What they got right (the part that made me write this review)
I’ve trained myself to expect “broker-backed prop firm” to be a marketing phrase that doesn’t mean anything in practice. With Blueberry, four things stood out as actually different.
Static drawdown, calculated honestly
Drawdown is calculated from the higher of previous-day equity or balance, and it stays static — meaning if you’re funded with $10K and your max DD is 10%, the floor is $9K and it stays at $9K, full stop. It does not trail your high-water mark.
The trailing-drawdown trap is what kills a large share of funded traders at the firms I’ve reviewed. You make $2K, the floor moves up, you give back $1.5K (still net up $500), and you’re closed. With static, you can give back everything you made and still be at break-even. That’s how trading actually works. The Instant programs use trailing-lock instead, which is a fair compromise.
No consistency rule
Most firms have a consistency clause buried in the T&Cs — your single best day can’t be more than 30–50% of your total profit, or you can’t withdraw. It exists to prevent traders from passing on one lucky day. It also punishes anyone whose strategy genuinely has a fat-tailed return distribution (which most edge-based discretionary trading does).
Blueberry has zero consistency requirement on every program. There’s a 30% rule mentioned once in the legal PDF, but it applies to withdrawal sizing (you can’t withdraw more than 30% of your profit balance in one go), not to qualifying for a payout. That’s a different and far less restrictive thing.
Martingale and grid trading are now allowed (post-March 12, 2026)
I’m not personally a martingale trader and I think it’s a way to lose money slowly. But the fact that Blueberry’s March 12, 2026 ruleset update removed martingale and grid from the prohibited list — along with lot-size restrictions, position stacking, all-in trading, and excessive scalping — tells me the firm trusts its risk model. Firms that ban these techniques usually do so because their liquidity provider can’t handle them, which means they’re running a B-book and don’t actually want you to win.
The caveat: this applies to accounts purchased on or after March 12, 2026. If you bought before that date, your account runs on the old, more restrictive ruleset. New accounts are the cleaner play.
What’s still hard-banned (regardless of purchase date): latency arbitrage, external hedging, HFT, tick scalping, toxic trading flow, bad faith trading, and third-party copy trading. HFT and tick scalping bans are the ones to read carefully — if your strategy holds positions for “a few seconds to capture minimal price movements” or “executes a large number of trades in extremely short timeframes using automated systems,” you’re at risk of an immediate hard breach. This isn’t a firm for true scalpers, despite the loosened ruleset.
Payout cadence is fast
Default is 14 days. There’s a “7-day payout” add-on that costs +20% on top of the challenge fee, which I think is a strange way to monetize but at least it’s transparent. There’s also on-demand payout — request whenever your minimum trading days are met. The home page advertises payouts processed within 24 hours of approval.
To qualify for any payout you need at least $100 in realized profit and 3 active trading days (and an active day only counts if you closed at least 0.5% in realized profit on equity that day — so a flat day or a tiny gain doesn’t tick). The first payout is gated to 14 days after your first trade in the Earnings Account. After that, the rhythm is yours.
What’s strange or annoying
I’d be a worse reviewer if I left out the parts that bother me.
Conservative leverage. 1:30 on FX (1:50 only on the 2-Step challenge phase — drops to 1:30 once funded) is below industry default. Most prop firms run 1:100. Blueberry’s reasoning is risk-management — lower leverage means fewer blowups, which means more sustainable payouts — and there’s a logic to it. But if you’re a high-frequency intraday trader who needs leverage to make the math work on tight stops, you’ll feel cramped here.
HFT and tick scalping = hard breach. Both are explicitly prohibited at every stage, on every account, regardless of purchase date. The firm defines tick scalping as “holding trades for only a few seconds to capture minimal price movements” and HFT as algorithmic systems “executing a large number of trades in extremely short timeframes.” If that’s your style, look elsewhere.
Third-party copy trading banned. External signal services, copy-trading platforms, and third-party account management trigger immediate account closure. The nuance: copy trading between your own Blueberry accounts is allowed, so a trader running multiple Blueberry accounts can mirror their own strategy. But signal subscribers are out.
News-trading restricted. A 2-minute window before and 2-minute window after every high-impact (red folder) news release is off-limits — no opening, no closing, no order modification. Hit your TP or SL during the window and you may still get the profit removed at payout request, or have the entire payout voided if 3+ trades fall in restricted windows. There’s a small carve-out: positions opened 6+ hours before a news event that take their stop-loss during the window are not penalized. Read the full no-news-trading policy before you assume “Allowed (Subject to Policy)” in the home table means actually allowed.
Crypto leverage capped at 1:2. Two. If you came here for crypto, just leave. There are dedicated crypto-trading firms with proper leverage. Blueberry’s crypto exposure is more of a checkbox than a real product.
Hedging single-account only. You can hedge inside one Blueberry account. You cannot hedge between two Blueberry accounts, and you cannot hedge using an external broker against your Blueberry position. The cross-account / external-hedge ban exists because that’s how arbitrage abuse usually starts — but it does mean you can’t fund-isolate two strategies that need to be net-flat.
Inactivity = breach. 30 consecutive days without a completed trade auto-closes your account. If you take long breaks, set a calendar reminder.
The “$1-25K instant” tier is a marketing pitch, not a real account. The smallest Instant Lite at $1-25K with a 4% drawdown means you have $50 of room before you’re closed. It’s a starter funnel. Don’t take it seriously as a path to scaling.
Scaling doesn’t apply to Instant accounts. The Scaling Plan that grows your balance 25% every 3 months and lifts your profit split toward 90% is evaluation-program-only. Instant Elite and Instant Lite traders never scale. If long-term capital growth matters to you, that’s a meaningful argument for taking the eval path even if Instant looks faster.
The dashboard is functional but not great. Compared to the dashboards I’ve seen at FTMO and Lucid, it feels generic. Small thing and not a deal-breaker, but worth saying.
Restricted countries — read this before you pay
The geofence list as of April 2026: United States, Australia, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Myanmar, North Korea, Russia, Somalia, Syria, UAE, Yemen, Afghanistan, Belarus.
The two that surprise people most: U.S. residents can’t open an account, and Australian residents can’t either — even though the parent broker (Blueberry Markets) is Australian-licensed and operates ASIC-regulated services for Australian clients. The prop firm legal entity sits outside that license, which means it can’t accept Australian retail traders for the Technology Access program. If you’re in Australia, you’d need an offshore broker relationship to use this product, and that’s a regulatory grey zone you should not enter without legal advice.
The UAE restriction is also unusual — most prop firms are happy to take Emirati clients. Blueberry’s reasoning isn’t published but I suspect it’s tied to specific KYC obligations.
The full live list is at blueberryfunded.com under their T&Cs, and we maintain the cross-reference on our Blueberry Funded overview page — verified monthly.
Who I’d tell to skip Blueberry Funded
Affiliate-incentive aside: this isn’t the right firm for everyone. If any of the below describes you, I’d point you elsewhere first.
You trade primarily crypto. 1:2 leverage is too low to be useful. Look at firms with dedicated crypto programs.
Your strategy depends on third-party copy trading or paid signal subscriptions. Hard ban. (Copy trading between your own Blueberry accounts is allowed, so multi-account self-mirroring is fine.)
You’re an HFT or tick-scalping algorithmic trader. Both are hard-banned regardless of when you opened the account. Don’t pay the fee.
You’re a U.S. or Australian resident and you’d be the account holder. Geofenced.
You’re a high-frequency scalper trading 1:200 with sub-pip targets. The leverage caps and the daily DD will eat you. There are firms designed for this style — Blueberry isn’t.
- You want a futures-focused product. Blueberry is forex-and-CFD-first. Look at Lucid Trading or our futures-firm comparison instead.
For everyone else — discretionary forex traders, swing traders, position traders, patient indices traders — for that specific profile, Blueberry is one of my top recommendations for 2026 — note the tension with its overall Propfirmito Score (62.8/100), which also weighs leverage caps, geographic access and a young payout track record.
Frequently asked questions
Is Blueberry Funded legit or a scam?
It’s legit. The parent broker (Blueberry Markets) has been operating under Australian regulation since 2015. The prop firm launched in 2024 and has paid out $7,418,270 to 10,600 traders to date according to their live counter.
What’s the cheapest way to get funded with Blueberry Funded?
Instant Lite at $42.50 ($1.25K) minus the 50% first-time RAMESCO discount = roughly $21.25. That gets you a small Instant account with no profit target. It’s the cheapest entry into a Blueberry funded account that exists right now.
What’s the actual profit split?
80% on every program at the start. Scales to 90% via their formal Scaling Plan, which kicks in if you make at least 10% net profit over 3 consecutive months and take at least 4 payouts in that window. Account size also scales by 25% every 3 months under those conditions, up to a $2M maximum allocation. Instant accounts are not eligible for scaling.
How fast do they pay?
Default cycle is 14 days. On-demand and 7-day-cycle options exist (the 7-day costs +20% on the challenge fee). Once a payout is submitted, processing is under 24 hours per their site. To request a payout you need at least $100 in realized profit and 3 active trading days where each day closed ≥0.5% in realized profit on equity.
Is news trading allowed?
No, not really — despite the home page table saying “Allowed (Subject to Policy).” The actual rule: you must not open or close trades (including TP/SL fills) in the 2 minutes before and 2 minutes after any high-impact (red folder) news release. Violations on the funded account will see profit removed at payout, and 3+ violations in one cycle voids the entire payout and resets your earnings account. There’s one carve-out: positions held for 6+ hours before a news event that hit their stop-loss inside the window are not penalized. If your strategy depends on NFP, CPI, or central-bank-decision setups, this firm isn’t built for you.
Can I use an EA or automated strategy?
Yes for in-house EAs and automated strategies you’ve built. No for third-party copy trading, mirror trading, or paid signal services — those are a hard ban and trigger immediate account closure. Copy trading between your own Blueberry accounts is permitted. HFT and tick-scalping algorithms are also banned regardless of who built them.
Can I hold trades over the weekend?
Yes. They explicitly allow it on every program. The standard caveats apply — gaps can move against you and the daily DD is calculated against Sunday’s open, so size accordingly.
What platforms can I trade on?
MT4, MT5, TradeLocker, and DXtrade. Most traders I know use MT5. TradeLocker is the modern web-first option if you don’t want to install a desktop terminal.
Is the drawdown trailing or static?
Static on the evaluation programs (Prime 2-Step, 1-Step, 2-Step). Trailing-lock on the Instant programs. Static is the friendlier option and the one I’d default to. The daily DD calculation uses the higher of previous-day equity or balance, which is also trader-friendly.
How do I use the RAMESCO discount?
The banner at the top of this article has the live code and the apply link. Click through, the discount applies at checkout. The up-to-50% rate (50% for first-time users) is what we negotiate with the firm directly — when it changes (it does occasionally), the banner here updates from the same source as our home page, so you’ll always see the current rate without us having to hand-edit a hundred articles.
My verdict
Blueberry Funded is the firm I’d recommend to a non-U.S., non-Australian discretionary forex trader who wanted one prop firm to commit to in 2026. The static drawdown, no consistency rule, and broker-backed infrastructure put it in a different category from the average funded-account marketplace. The conservative leverage, the news-trading restriction, and the HFT/tick-scalping/third-party-copy-trading bans will eliminate it for some traders — that’s fine, those traders should look elsewhere.
If you fit the profile, start with the 2-Step at the $25K or $50K size. It’s the broadest sweet spot in the lineup and gives you enough room to run a real strategy. With the RAMESCO discount applied at the top of this article, as a first-time user you’ll pay half the list price — see the pricing table above for your size. Submit, pass, get funded, take payouts.
The next thing I’m watching is whether they keep the static drawdown spec when they grow. Most firms tighten the rules as their book gets bigger. If Blueberry holds the line on static, no consistency, and 80% split, this becomes an obvious top-three recommendation in 2027. If they break any of those, I’ll write the correction here and register it in our corrections log.
Last verified: September 25, 2026.