Earn2Trade
Updated 2026-11-08 · recalculates automatically on data changes
Earn2Trade scores 63.1 out of 100 (grade B) on the Propfirmito Score, ranking #11 of 15 Futures prop firms we rate. Its strongest area is Trust & legitimacy; its clearest room for improvement is Cost. The score is recalculated automatically whenever the firm's verified data changes.
Score breakdown
This firmFutures average
How it compares with the Futures average
This firmFutures average
What stands out
Time pressure
Minimum trading days: 0; no deadline; consistency rule: 30%.
Ease of passing
Fastest route to funding: a 1-step evaluation, with a profit target around 6%.
Company transparency
In place: CEO named publicly; legal entity public; restricted-country list published.
Where it can improve
Profit split
Base profit split of 71%. We score the split you actually start with, not the advertised maximum.
A higher starting split — or a documented path to 100% — is worth more than any other single factor.
Challenge price
A $10,000 evaluation costs about $44.33 here (weighted as recurring because pricing is a monthly subscription). We compare list prices only — never discounted prices.
Lower list pricing per $10,000 of buying power earns more points; discounts don't count, so only the list price moves this.
Trading freedom
Allowed: news trading. Not allowed or not stated: trading robots (EAs), copy trading, hedging.
Each additional freedom (news trading, robots, copy trading, hedging) adds points.
Drawdown room
Maximum drawdown of 4% (partly trailing, which shrinks the room you can actually use, so we discount it).
More drawdown room — or switching from trailing to static drawdown — would score higher.
Factor by factor
| Factor | What we measured | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & legitimacy | 20.7 / 21 | |
| Trader reviews | Rated 4.5★ on Trustpilot across 5,076 reviews. We shrink this toward the industry average so a small review base can't outweigh thousands. Trustpilot profile | 9.2 / 12 |
| Company transparency | In place: CEO named publicly; legal entity public; restricted-country list published. | 5.0 / 5 |
| Legal home base | Registered in United States. | 4.0 / 4 |
| Cost | 4.8 / 15 | |
| Challenge price | A $10,000 evaluation costs about $44.33 here (weighted as recurring because pricing is a monthly subscription). We compare list prices only — never discounted prices. | 2.9 / 10 |
| Refunds & free retries | Evaluation fee not refundable; free retry available. | 1.9 / 5 |
| Trading conditions | 14.2 / 26 | |
| Trading freedom | Allowed: news trading. Not allowed or not stated: trading robots (EAs), copy trading, hedging. | 3.2 / 10 |
| Drawdown room | Maximum drawdown of 4% (partly trailing, which shrinks the room you can actually use, so we discount it). | 3.4 / 8 |
| Time pressure | Minimum trading days: 0; no deadline; consistency rule: 30%. | 7.7 / 8 |
| Ease of passing | 7.7 / 8 | |
| Ease of passing | Fastest route to funding: a 1-step evaluation, with a profit target around 6%. | 7.7 / 8 |
| Payouts | 8.5 / 20 | |
| Profit split | Base profit split of 71%. We score the split you actually start with, not the advertised maximum. | 6.3 / 13 |
| Payout track record | No verifiable payout-speed evidence yet — scored conservatively. | 2.2 / 7 |
| Accessibility | 7.2 / 10 | |
| Country access | Restricted countries: 25; US traders are accepted. | 5.0 / 5 |
| Platform choice | Trading platforms supported: 2. | 1.0 / 2 |
| Variety & scaling | Challenge types: 1; accounts scale up to $400K. | 1.2 / 3 |
Data the firm doesn't publish
Every scored factor is backed by published, verified data — nothing had to be estimated.
How this score works
The Propfirmito Score rates each firm from 0 to 100 using 14 measurable factors in six pillars: trust & legitimacy (21 pts), trading conditions (26), payouts (20), cost (15), accessibility (10) and ease of passing (8). Every input is a verifiable fact — review ratings, list prices, published rules — taken from the firm's own site and re-checked continuously.
Every firm is scored on one fixed 0–100 scale, set once, so scores stay directly comparable across the whole list and from month to month. Grades: A+ (90+), A (84+), A− (78+), B+ (70+), B (62+), B− (54+), C+ (46+).
Review ratings are shrunk toward the industry average so a handful of reviews can't outweigh thousands, and a firm with no verifiable review base scores zero on that factor. Firms are ranked within their own asset class (Forex, Futures, Crypto) on one shared scale.
Disclosure: propfirmito.com is reader-supported — we may earn a commission if you buy through our links. Commissions never influence scores: pricing is scored on list prices only, discounts are excluded, and the formula is published so anyone can recompute it.
Frequently asked questions
What is Earn2Trade's Propfirmito Score?
Earn2Trade scores 63.1/100 (grade B), ranking #11 of 15 Futures prop firms rated by Propfirmito.
What is Earn2Trade best at?
Its strongest factors are: Time pressure, Ease of passing, Company transparency.
Where can Earn2Trade improve?
Its clearest improvement areas are: Profit split, Challenge price, Trading freedom, Drawdown room.
How is the Propfirmito Score calculated?
From 14 verified factors in six pillars — trust & legitimacy, cost, trading conditions, ease of passing, payouts and accessibility — using fixed scoring anchors and a published formula, all on one 0–100 scale. Scores recalculate automatically when a firm's data changes.
Is Earn2Trade trustworthy?
Earn2Trade's trust & legitimacy pillar scores 98.6/100 in our model. Rated 4.5★ on Trustpilot across 5,076 reviews. We shrink this toward the industry average so a small review base can't outweigh thousands. No score is a guarantee — always apply your own judgement too.
Data source: earn2trade.com — Earn2Trade’s own published terms and pricing, independently verified · Score last recalculated 2026-11-08 · Report generated live — it always reflects the current score.
