Home › Rankings › Ment Funding Futures
Ment Funding Futures
Updated 2026-09-24 · recalculates automatically on data changes
Ment Funding Futures scores 66.7 out of 100 (grade B) on the Propfirmito Score, ranking #9 of 11 Futures prop firms we rate. Its strongest area is Trading conditions; its clearest room for improvement is Cost. The score is recalculated automatically whenever the firm's verified data changes.
Score breakdown
This firmFutures average
How it compares with the Futures average
This firmFutures average
What stands out
Trading freedom
Allowed: news trading, trading robots (EAs), copy trading, hedging.
Trader reviews
Rated 4.8★ on Trustpilot across 231 reviews. We shrink this toward the industry average so a small review base can't outweigh thousands. Trustpilot profile
Drawdown room
Maximum drawdown of 6% (static).
Where it can improve
Challenge price
A $10,000 evaluation costs about $115 here. We compare list prices only — never discounted prices.
Lower list pricing per $10,000 of buying power earns more points; discounts don't count, so only the list price moves this.
Profit split
Base profit split of 75%. We score the split you actually start with, not the advertised maximum.
A higher starting split — or a documented path to 100% — is worth more than any other single factor.
Payout track record
No verifiable payout-speed evidence yet — scored conservatively.
Publishing verifiable payout evidence (processing times, payout records) upgrades this factor.
Refunds & free retries
Evaluation fee not refundable; no free retry.
A refundable evaluation fee and/or a free retry would add up to 5 points.
Factor by factor
| Factor | What we measured | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Trust & legitimacy | 17.1 / 21 | |
| Trader reviews | Rated 4.8★ on Trustpilot across 231 reviews. We shrink this toward the industry average so a small review base can't outweigh thousands. Trustpilot profile | 11.5 / 12 |
| Company transparency | In place: CEO named publicly; legal entity public. Missing: a published restricted-country list. | 4.3 / 5 |
| Legal home base | The legal domicile is not published — scored conservatively. | 1.3 / 4 |
| Cost | 1.5 / 15 | |
| Challenge price | A $10,000 evaluation costs about $115 here. We compare list prices only — never discounted prices. | 1.5 / 10 |
| Refunds & free retries | Evaluation fee not refundable; no free retry. | 0.0 / 5 |
| Trading conditions | 26.0 / 26 | |
| Trading freedom | Allowed: news trading, trading robots (EAs), copy trading, hedging. | 10.0 / 10 |
| Drawdown room | Maximum drawdown of 6% (static). | 8.0 / 8 |
| Time pressure | Minimum trading days: 0; a maximum time limit applies; consistency rule: 33%. | 5.1 / 8 |
| Ease of passing | 5.1 / 8 | |
| Ease of passing | Fastest route to funding: a 1-step evaluation, with a profit target around 10%. | 5.1 / 8 |
| Payouts | 9.7 / 20 | |
| Profit split | Base profit split of 75%. We score the split you actually start with, not the advertised maximum. | 7.5 / 13 |
| Payout track record | No verifiable payout-speed evidence yet — scored conservatively. | 2.2 / 7 |
| Accessibility | 5.3 / 10 | |
| Country access | The restricted-country list is not published — we use a conservative estimate. | 3.5 / 5 |
| Platform choice | Trading platforms supported: 1. | 0.5 / 2 |
| Variety & scaling | Challenge types: 1; accounts scale up to $400K. | 1.2 / 3 |
Data the firm doesn't publish
When a firm doesn't publish something, we never guess in its favor: the missing value is filled conservatively and listed here. Publishing the data is the easiest way for a firm to raise its score.
- Legal domicile not published — scored conservatively
- Restricted-country list not published — conservative estimate used
How this score works
The Propfirmito Score rates each firm from 0 to 100 using 14 measurable factors in six pillars: trust & legitimacy (21 pts), trading conditions (26), payouts (20), cost (15), accessibility (10) and ease of passing (8). Every input is a verifiable fact — review ratings, list prices, published rules — taken from the firm's own site and re-checked continuously.
Every firm is scored on one fixed 0–100 scale, set once, so scores stay directly comparable across the whole list and from month to month. Grades: A+ (90+), A (84+), A− (78+), B+ (70+), B (62+), B− (54+), C+ (46+).
Review ratings are shrunk toward the industry average so a handful of reviews can't outweigh thousands, and a firm with no verifiable review base scores zero on that factor. Firms are ranked within their own asset class (Forex, Futures, Crypto) on one shared scale.
Disclosure: propfirmito.com is reader-supported — we may earn a commission if you buy through our links. Commissions never influence scores: pricing is scored on list prices only, discounts are excluded, and the formula is published so anyone can recompute it.
Frequently asked questions
What is Ment Funding Futures's Propfirmito Score?
Ment Funding Futures scores 66.7/100 (grade B), ranking #9 of 11 Futures prop firms rated by Propfirmito.
What is Ment Funding Futures best at?
Its strongest factors are: Trading freedom, Trader reviews, Drawdown room.
Where can Ment Funding Futures improve?
Its clearest improvement areas are: Challenge price, Profit split, Payout track record, Refunds & free retries.
How is the Propfirmito Score calculated?
From 14 verified factors in six pillars — trust & legitimacy, cost, trading conditions, ease of passing, payouts and accessibility — using fixed scoring anchors and a published formula, all on one 0–100 scale. Scores recalculate automatically when a firm's data changes.
Is Ment Funding Futures trustworthy?
Ment Funding Futures's trust & legitimacy pillar scores 81.2/100 in our model. Rated 4.8★ on Trustpilot across 231 reviews. We shrink this toward the industry average so a small review base can't outweigh thousands. No score is a guarantee — always apply your own judgement too.
Data source: mentfunding.com — Ment Funding Futures’s own published terms and pricing, independently verified · Score last recalculated 2026-09-24 · Report generated live — it always reflects the current score.